En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. Vol 7, No 3
  4. Diagnostics of the formation of semantic reading i...

Diagnostics of the formation of semantic reading in the work of secondary school students with educational mathematical texts

Research Article
EDN: NNKUCM DOI: 10.31483/r-111850
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 7
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 7
Author:
Alexey R. Romashchenko 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
50-59
Received: 23 May 2024 / Accepted: 20 August 2024 / Published: 26 August 2024

Rating:
Article accesses:
748
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Volgograd State Pedagogical University
For citation:
Romashchenko A. R. (2024). Diagnostics of the formation of semantic reading in the work of secondary school students with educational mathematical texts. Development of education, 7(3), 50-59. EDN: NNKUCM. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-111850
UDC 372.851

Abstract

Learning is working with a variety of educational texts based on reading, understanding, evaluating and interpreting information. To identify the result of reading an educational mathematical text and the quality of understanding the meaning of the text space created by educational materials, it is necessary to diagnose reading, namely, the level of semantic reading. In the modern study of reading, the PISA international monitoring, the concept of reading literacy, its components and levels are defined. The success of understanding more complex educational mathematical texts will depend on the level of reader literacy. If the levels of reading literacy have evaluation criteria and diagnostic apparatus, then how to assess the level of semantic reading? The article examines the relationship between the levels of reading literacy and text comprehension, models for assessing the semantic complexity of the text and semantic reading skills, various level structures for diagnosing the understanding of a mathematical educational text. Based on the studied scientific material, the complexity of the educational mathematical text "Triangle" was assessed according to criteria such as the number of words, simple words, scientific terms and their complexity, the number of mentions of scientific terms in each paragraph. Diagnostic material has also been created to check the understanding of this text, each task of which is aimed at determining the understanding of each information block and assessing the degree of development of semantic reading.

References

  1. 1. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. A., Antsyferova, L. I., Brushlinsky, A. V. (1997). Psychological science in Russia of the twentieth century: problems of theory and history., 574. Moscow: IP RAS.
  2. 2. Atanasyan, L. S., Butuzov, V. F., Kadomtsev, S. B., etc. (2024). Mathematics. Geometry: Grades 7-9. Basic level: Textbook., 416. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
  3. 3. Atrokhova, T. V. (2014). Diagnostic methods of semantic reading. The pedagogical legacy of K.D. Ushinsky: materials of the scientific and practical conference. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushinsky, 312–317. EDN: VUXLOF.
  4. 4. Bershadsky, M. E. (2024). Understanding as a pedagogical category (monitoring of the cognitive sphere: does the student understand what he is studying?)., 176. Moscow: Pedagogical Search Center. EDN: QTBGFR
  5. 5. Gidlevsky, A. V., Zdrikovskaya, T. A. (2012). Layered model of text understanding. Herald Of Omsk University, 4(66), 170–173. EDN: RRQMBL
  6. 6. Zabrodina, N. P., Barsukov, I. E., Burdakova, A. A. [et al.]. (2021). Reader's literacy: a handbook for the development of functional literacy of high school students., 80. Moscow: Academy of the Ministry of Education of Russia.
  7. 7. Kornev, A. N., Ishimova, O. A. (2010). Methods of diagnosis of dyslexia in children: a methodological guide., 70. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Polytechnic University. EDN: QYFSSD
  8. 8. Kornilov, Yu. K. (1979). Psychological problems of understanding (understanding as cognition, as a type of thinking, understanding in industrial activity)., 80. Yaroslavl: Publishing house of YarGU.
  9. 9. Mayer, R. V. (2020). Didactic complexity of educational texts and its assessment., 149. Glazov: Glazov State Pedagogical Institute named after V.G. Korolenko. EDN: WEERPS
  10. 10. Mayer, R. V. (2019). An imitation model of the activity of a student reading a text. The Periodical Scientific and Methodological Electronic Journal "Koncept", 6, 78–90. EDN: QDQONU
  11. 11. Makarov, M. I., Mamchenko, A. A. (2021). Culture of reading in the post-literacy age: methods and techniques to form meaningful reading skills in schoolchildren. Literature at School, 4, 91–104. EDN: ZKPLOX. https://doi.org/10.31862/0130-3414-2021-4-91-104
  12. 12. Popova, V. I. (2021). Pedagogical possibilities of semantic reading in the context of textual activity of students. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 72-1, 241–244. EDN: TLWBYH
  13. 13. Samsonova, T. V., Shastina, T. V., Prikazchikova, O. A., Paramonova, A. A. (2022). Semantic reading as the basis for the formation and development of functional literacy skills: a methodological guide., 32. Saransk: TSNPPM "Teacher".
  14. 14. Sapa, A. V. (2010). The system of monitoring and evaluating student achievements in Russian language and literature lessons in high school. Experiment and innovation at school, 1, 71–80. EDN: MVICJH
  15. 15. Seregin, G. M. (2009). About diagnosis of pupil's understanding levels. The Education and Science Journal, 8(65), 80–85. EDN: JWKEJK
  16. 16. Shevandrin, N. I. (2001). Psychodiagnostics, correction and personality development., 512. Moscow: Vlados.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.