Formation of Intellectual Activity of Primary Schoolchildren in the Process of Learning to Play Chess

Research Article
EDN: EAXCPA DOI: 10.31483/r-99355
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Author:
Arslang Y. Doglaev 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
21-24
Received: 5 August 2021 / Accepted: 10 September 2021 / Published: 28 September 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
2291
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE “Kalmyk State University”
For citation:
Doglaev A. Y. (2021). Formation of Intellectual Activity of Primary Schoolchildren in the Process of Learning to Play Chess. Development of education, 4(3), 21-24. EDN: EAXCPA. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-99355
UDC 373.31

Abstract

The purpose of the article is the solution of the problem of activating the intelligence of students, it seems especially relevant as an innovative technological stage that promotes young chess players to a higher level of realization of creative inclinations and abilities, intellectual potential. The following methods are used in the learning process: observation, testing, conversation, game methods, methods for solving chess problems, writing games, designing and solving original chess problems, modern information technologies, participation in competitions, including the Internet competitions, viewing and analyzing the content of chess games, participation in tournaments and competitions, P. Torrens creativity test «Finish a painting». Results. The Torrence test, conducted at the beginning and at the end of the study, determined the effectiveness of the experiment. We got a result that differs from the initial one: if the number of children with a low level was 27%, then at the final stage up to 19%, some of them moved to the middle level, some went to the group with a high level. The number of students with a high level at the beginning – 12%, at the end of the experiment – 21%. Conclusions. The intellectual activity of younger schoolchildren in the process of learning to play chess suggests that the student demonstrates the ability to break from the traditional solution and type of tasks to another type of tasks – original, non-standard, having a different proof algorithm, significantly improves the quality of training of young chess players, activates mental activity. The main thing is the active internal activity of the child himself, the realization of intellectual abilities, the development of inclinations, their transformation into intellectual abilities, unconventional, contradictory, creative thinking, the presence of a life goal to achieve chess heights, which determines his further own nature of activity.

References

  1. 1. Binet, A. (2012). Umstvennye sposobnosti: ikh izmerenie, ikh vospitanie. Psikhologiia sposobnostei: khrestomatiia, 488. M.: MPSU; Voronezh: MODEK.
  2. 2. Comte-Sponville, A.S. (2012). Philosophical Dictionary, 752. M.: Eterna.
  3. 3. Leites, N.S. (1971). Umstvennye sposobnosti i vozrast. M.
  4. 4. Onishina, V.V. (2016). Razvitie intellekta mladshego shkol'nika v urochnoi i vneurochnoi deiatel'nosti. Akademiia sotsial'nogo upravleniia. 1, 363–369. M.
  5. 5. Pankin, A.B. Formation of an ethnocultural personality, 279. M.: Moskovskii psikhologo-sotsial'nyi in-t; Voronezh: Izd. dom. RAO.
  6. 6. Piaget J. (1994). Selected psychological works. M.
  7. 7. Elkonin, D.B. (1971). On the problem of periodization of mental development in childhood. Voprosy Psychologii, 4.
  8. 8. Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.