Somatisms in the Kyrgyz folklore

Research Article
EDN: PFSTKI DOI: 10.31483/r-21991
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Author:
Sabira Z. Zhancharbekova 1
Work direction:
Discussion
Pages:
79-81
Received: 18 December 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
5267
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Kyrgyz National University named after Zhusup Balasaghyn
For citation:
Zhancharbekova S. Z. (2019). Somatisms in the Kyrgyz folklore. Development of education, 79-81. EDN: PFSTKI. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-21991
UDC 8

Abstract

The analysis of Kyrgyz folklore was done by various researchers. Present work is dedicated to the somatism lexis, transmitting a whole range of images, concepts and associations that reflect the peculiarities of the world view and the world perception of the ancient people. The names of body parts – somatism – belong to the oldest parts of the vocabulary, which evolved over the millennia and reflected the ancient knowledge of man about himself and his body. In a large number somatisms were used by storytellers in the performance of their national epics. The article considers the concept of «somatisms», examples of somatisms in the physical description of heroes of the Kyrgyz epic «Manas», «Kurmanbek», «The Legend of Sarinzhi Buky» are represented.

References

  1. 1. Arutiunov, N. D. (1999). Iazyk i mir cheloveka., 896. M.: Iazyki russkoi kul'tury.
  2. 2. Masaleva, N. V. Somatizmy v russkoi iazykovoi kartine mira. Retrieved from http://www.dissercat.com/content/somatizmy-v-russkoi-yazykovoi-kartine-mira
  3. 3. Akhmetzhanova, G. A. (2007). Somaticheskaia frazeologiia kak otrazhenie natsional'no-kul'turnoi spetsifiki iazykovogo soznaniia. Almaty.
  4. 4. Orozbakov, S. (1978). Manas. Kn. 1. F.: Kyrgyzstan.
  5. 5. (1961). Kurmanbek: Geroich. poema., 149. F.: Uchpedgiz.
  6. 6. (1958). Skazanie o Sarindzhi: Kyrg. epos., 130. F.: Uchpedgiz.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.