En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. Vol 6, No 1
  4. Peculiarities of the Spot the Nonsense method perf...

Peculiarities of the Spot the Nonsense method performance in 5-year-old children with level III general delay in speech development. (report 1)

Research Article
EDN: RKOFXH DOI: 10.31483/r-105552
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Author:
Oksana M. Kovalenko 1
Work direction:
Psychology in Education
Pages:
61-67
Received: 22 February 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 29 March 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1692
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
For citation:
Kovalenko O. M. (2023). Peculiarities of the Spot the Nonsense method performance in 5-year-old children with level III general delay in speech development. (report 1). Development of education, 6(1), 61-67. EDN: RKOFXH. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-105552
UDC 376.3

Abstract

The introduction describes the features of thinking, perception and analyzing observation of children with ONR, which make it difficult to correctly analyze and evaluate visual information. The research methodology is the task «Nelepies» in the version presented by R.S. Nemov. The results of the study provide generalized quantitative results for individual absurdities. Qualitative analysis captures the correct answers and reveals the mechanisms of children's erroneous answers. Qualitative characteristics of the analysis carried out by normally developing children and children with OHP (III level) aged 5 years when considering this image are presented: options for explaining inconsistencies (whether everything is drawn correctly) and options for clarifying answers (how it should actually be). For each option for explaining and clarifying discrepancies, generalized quantitative data and a quantitative difference between the results of normally developing children and children with OHP (III level) are given. All variants of explanations and clarifications are illustrated by the children's answers and presented in accordance with the quantitative difference between the indicators of children with normal speech development and GR (III level). At the same time, variants with a quantitative predominance in the norm, variants with a quantitative predominance in OHP (level III) and variants that are noted only in OHP (level III) are indicated. In conclusion, a sequence of established options for explanations and clarifications is presented in terms of the degree of quantitative difference between the indicators of normally developing children and children with OHP (level III) from a larger difference to a smaller one.

References

  1. 1. Volkovskaya, T. N. (1999). Sravnitel’noe izuchenie narushenij myslitel’noj i rechevoj deyatel’nosti u doshkol’nikov s ZPR i ONR [PhD thesis].
  2. 2. Zakharova, E. A. (2011). Psihologicheskie osobennosti vospriyatiya mladshih shkol’nikov s zaderzhkoj psihicheskogo razvitiya i obshchim nedorazvitiem rechi [PhD thesis].
  3. 3. Kovalenko, O. M. (2007). Osobennosti kratkovremennogo analiziruyushchego nablyudeniya u detej starshego doshkol’nogo vozrasta s obshchim nedorazvitiem rechi III urovnya. Detskaya I Podrostkovaya Reabilitaciya, 1(8), 16–22.
  4. 4. Nemov, R. S. (2001). Psihologiya: ucheb. dlya stud. vyssh. ped. ucheb. zavedenij: Kn. 3: Psihodiagnostika. Vvedenie v nauchnoe psihologicheskoe issledovanie s elementami matematicheskoj statistiki. Vlados.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.