Теоретический анализ ролей участников школьного буллинга
Глава в книге


- Опубликовано в:
- монография «Современные вопросы педагогики и психологии: теоретико-методологические подходы и практические результаты исследований»
- Автор:
- Король Н. В. 1
- Рубрика:
- Глава 8
- Страницы:
- 131-153
- Получена: 25.01.2024
- Рейтинг:
- Статья просмотрена:
- 720 раз
- Размещено в:
- РИНЦ
DOI: 10.31483/r-109940
Аннотация
В главе рассмотрено понятие ролей в буллинге, на основании анализа литературных источников выделены основные роли: агрессор, жертва, свидетель, подкрепляющий поведение буллера, помощник буллера, пассивный наблюдатель, защитник жертвы, а также описаны психологические характеристики школьников, занимающих разные позиции в ситуации буллинга.
Ключевые слова
Список литературы
- 1. Алексеева Е.В. Личностные ресурсы защитников жертвы и агрессоров, участников буллинга в ситуации морального выбора / Е.В. Алексеева, А.П. Николаева // Профилактика девиантного поведения детей и молодежи: региональные модели и технологии: сборник статей по материалам Международной научно-практической конференции, посвящается 75-летию Гуманитарно-педагогической академии / под ред. В.В. Коврова. – 2019. – С. 248–251. – EDN JPQPAX
- 2. Волкова И.В. Характеристики субъектности и психологического благополучия у подростков-защитников в ситуации буллинга в школе / И.В. Волкова // Психология человека в образовании. – 2019. – Т. 1. №2. – С. 110–116. DOI: 10.33910/2686-9527-2019-1-2-110-116. – EDN GZNBUK
- 3. Королев А.А. Взаимосвязь типа личности жертвы со спецификой воздействия буллинга / А.А. Королев // Психолог. – 2021. – №4. – С. 1–10. – DOI 10.25136/2409-8701.2021.4.36256. – EDN EYLYIH
- 4. Ледовая Я.А. Отчуждение моральной ответственности: психологический конструкт и методы его измерения / Я.А. Ледовая, Р.В. Тихонов, О.Н. Боголюбова [и др.] // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. – 2016. – №4. – С. 23–39. – DOI 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.402. – EDN YFMSBJ
- 5. Обухова Ю.В. Образ сверстника – жертвы буллинга у школьников с разной выраженностью виктимного поведения / Ю.В. Обухова, В.О. Гурьева // Российский психологический журнал. – 2017. – Т. 14. №2. – С. 118–134. – DOI 10.21702/rpj.2017.2.7. – EDN WIGASK
- 6. Albores-Gallo L., Sauceda-García J.M., Ruiz-Velasco S., Roque-Santiago E. Bullying and its association with psychiatric disorders in a Mexican school sample // Salud Pública de México. – 2011. – Vol. 53. №3. – P. 220–227.
- 7. Arseneault L. The long-term impact of bullying victimization on mental health // World psychiatry. – 2017. – №16 (1). – P. 27–28.
- 8. Barchia K., Bussey K. Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors // International Journal of Behavioral Development. – 2011. Vol. 35. №4. – P. 289–297.
- 9. Baumeister R.F., Stillwell A.M., Heatherton T.F. Guilt: an interpersonal approach // Psychological bulletin. – 1994. – №115 (2). – P. 243. – EDN HKCNOD
- 10. Boulton M.J., Flemington I. The effects of a short video intervention on secondary school pupils’ involvement in definitions of and attitudes to-wards bullying // School Psychology International. – 1996. – Vol. 17. – P. 331–345. – DOI 10.1177/0143034396174003. – EDN JPWBAR
- 11. Cappadocia M.C., Pepler D., Cummings J.G., Craig W. Individual motiva-tions and characteristics associated with bystander intervention during bul-lying episodes among children and youth // Canadian Journal of School Psychology. – 2012. – Vol. 27 (3). – P. 201–216.
- 12. Coloroso B. The Bully, the Bullied and the Bystander. – New York, NY: Harper Collins, 2003. – 272 p.
- 13. Craig W.M. The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children // Personality and in-dividual differences. – 1998. – Vol. 24 (1). – P. 123–130.
- 14. Cowie H., Colliety P. Who cares about the bullies? // Pastoral Care in Education. – 2016. – Vol. 34 (1). – P. 24–33.
- 15. DeRosier M.E., Cilleson A.H.N., Coie J.D., Dodge K. Group social con-text and children’s aggressive behavior // Child Development. – 1994. – Vol. 65. – P. 1068–1079.
- 16. Eisenberg M.E., Gower A.L., McMorris B.J., Bucchianeri M.M. Vulnera-ble Bullies: Perpetration of Peer Harassment Among Youths Across Sexual Orientation, Weight, and Disability Status // Am J Public Health. – 2015. – Vol. 105 (9). – P. 1784–1791.
- 17. Forsberg C., Thornberg R., Samuelsson M. Bystanders to bullying: fourth-to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions // Research Papers in Education. – 2014. – Vol. 29 (5). – P. 557–576.
- 18. Gini G., Pozzoli T., Borghi F., Franzoni L. The role of bystanders in stu-dents' perception of bullying and sense of safety // Journal of School Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 46 (6). – P. 617–638.
- 19. Harel-Fisch Y., Walsh S.D., Fogel-Grinvald H., Amitai G., Pickett W., Molcho M., Due P., De Matos M.G., Craig W. Negative school perceptions and involvement in school bullying: A universal relationship across 40 countries // Journal of Adolescence. – 2011. – Vol. 34 (4). – P. 639–652. – DOI 10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.09.008. – EDN OLTQNB
- 20. Hawkins L., Pepler D., Craig W. Naturalistic observations of peer inter-ventions in bullying // Social development. – 2001. – Vol. 10 (4). – P. 512–527.
- 21. Hymel S., Schonert-Reichl K.A., Bonnano R.A., Vaillancourt T., Henderson N.R. Bullying and morality. Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective. – 2010. – P. 101–118.
- 22. Kärnä A., Voeten M., Poskiparta E., & Salmivalli C. Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders' behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization // Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. – 2010. – Vol. 56 (3). – P. 261–282.
- 23. Kumpulainen K., Räsänen E., Henttonen I. Children involved in bullying: Psychological disturbance and the persistence of the involvement // Child abuse & neglect. – 1999. – Vol. 23 (12). – P. 1253–1262.
- 24. Kutob R.M., Senf J.H., Crago M., & Shisslak C.M. Concurrent and longi-tudinal predictors of self-esteem in elementary and middle school girls // Journal of School Health. – 2010. – Vol. 80 (5). – P. 240–248.
- 25. Lopez Romero Maria E. The perceived role of bullying bystanders in Mex-ican secondary school settings. PhD thesis. – University of York. – 2017. – 375 p.
- 26. Nation M., Vieno A., Perkins D., Santinello M. Bullying in school and ad-olescent sense of empowerment: an analysis of relationships with parents, friends, and teachers // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. – 2008. Vol. 18 (3). – P. 211–232.
- 27. Nishina A., Juvonen J. Daily reports of witnessing and experiencing peer harassment in middle school // Child Development. – 2005. – Vol. 76. – P. 435–450.
- 28. Obermann M.L. Temporal aspects of moral disengagement in school bul-lying: crystallization or escalation? // Journal of school violence. – 2013. – Vol. 12 (2). – P. 193–210.
- 29. O’Connell P., Pepler D., Craig W. Peer involvement in bullying; insights and challenges for intervention // Journal of Adolescence. – 1999. – Vol. 22 (4). – P. 437–452. – EDN GRGPFF
- 30. Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among school-children: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program // Pepler D., Rubin K. The development and treatment of childhood aggression. – Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1991. – P. 411–448.
- 31. Olweus D. Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Cambridge, 1993. – 140 pp.
- 32. Paul J.J., Cillessen A.H. Dynamics of peer victimization in early adoles-cence: Results from a four-year longitudinal study // Journal of applied school psychology. – 2003. – Vol. 19 (2). – P. 25–43.
- 33. Peets K., Poyhonen V., Juvonen J., Salmivalli C. Classroom Norms of Bullying Alter the Degree to Which Children Defend in Response to Their Affective Empathy and Power // Developmental Psychology. – 2015. – Vol. 51 (7). – P. 913–920.
- 34. Pepler D.J., Craig W.M. A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observa-tions of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording // Developmental Psychology. – 1995. – Vol. 31. – P. 548–553. – EDN HFZVXN
- 35. Pronk J., Olthof T., & Goosens F. Factors Influencing Interventions on Behalf of Victims of Bullying: A Counterfactual Approach to the Social Cognitions of Outsiders and Defenders // Journal of Early Adolescence. – 2016. – Vol. 36 (2). – P. 267–291.
- 36. Quirk R., Campbell M. On standby? A comparison of online and offline witnesses to bullying and their bystander behavior // Educational Psychology. – 2015. – Vol. 35 (4). – P. 430–448.
- 37. Rigby K., Johnson B. Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied // Educational psychology. – 2006. – Vol. 26 (3). – P. 425–440.
- 38. Sainio M., Veenstra R., Huitsing G., Salmivalli C. Victims and their de-fenders: A dyadic approach // International Journal of Behavioral Development. – 2010. – Vol. 35 (2). – P. 144–151.
- 39. Salmivalli C., Lagerspetz K., Björkqvist K., Österman K., Kaukiainen A. Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group // Aggressive behavior. – 1996. – Vol. 22 (1). – P. 1–15.
- 40. Salmivalli C. Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? // Theory Into Practice. – 2014. – Vol. 53 (4). – P. 286–292.
- 41. Salmivalli C., Voeten M., Poskiparta E. Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms // Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. – 2011. – Vol. 40 (5). – P. 668–676.
- 42. Sharp S., Cowie H. Empowering pupils to take positive action against bullying / Smith P.K., Sharp S., editors. School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. – London: Routledge. – 1994. – P. 108–131.
- 43. Tani F., Greenman P., Schneider B., Fregoso M. Bullying and the Big Five: A Study of Childhood Personality and Participant Roles in Bullying Incidents // School Psychology International. – 2013. – Vol. 24 (2). – P. 131–146.
- 44. Vega López M.G., González Pérez G.J., Valle Barbosa M.A., Flores Vil-lavicencio, M. E., Vega López, A. Bullying in the Guadalajara, Mexico metropolitan zone: prevalence and related factors // Salud colectiva. – 2013. – Vol. 9 (2). – P. 183–194.
- 45. Whitney I., Smith P.K. A survey of the nature of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools // Educational Research. – 1993. – Vol. 35. – P. 3–25.
- 46. Wright J.C., Zakriski A.L., Fisher P. Age differences in the correlates perceived dominance // Social Development. – 1996. – Vol. 5. – P. 24–40.
- 47. Young-Jones A., Fursa S., Byrket J.S., Sly J.S. Bullying Affects More than Feelings: The Long-Term Implications of Victimization on Academic Motivation in Higher Education. Social Psychology Of Education: An International Journal. – 2015. – Vol. 18 (1). – P. 185–200.
Комментарии(0)