En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Monograph
  3. Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Format...
  4. Diagnosis of Voice Disorders Among University Teac...

Diagnosis of Voice Disorders Among University Teachers: Hygiene, Prevention and Recovery

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-99625
Open Access
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society»
Authors:
Elena A. Larina 1 , Evgeniia Patiupina 2
Work direction:
Глава 5
Pages:
99-113
Received: 17 October 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
1929
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FGBOU VO "Blagoveshchenskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet"
2 Private speech therapy center
For citation:
Mychko E. I., Zenkova D. M., Grigorets F. I., Shutova E. G., Ignateva G. A., Sdobniakov V. V., Sotkina S. A., Tulupova O. V., Larina E. A., Patiupina E., Ambartsumian N. A., Kostenko E. G., Tolstykh O. S., Sokolov V. L., Kostenko A. P., Matasova I. I., Voloskov I. V., Vallis I., & Serebrennikova A. V. (2021). Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society, 176. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/a-10314

Abstract

Voice is a unique means of communication and socialization of a person, the formation of a vast human multicultural space. It is used in a wide variety of professions and is a function with an interdisciplinary affiliation, therefore hygiene, health preservation, and voice restoration have a systemic convergent (interdisciplinary) nature. This problem is dealt with by specialists of pedagogical and medical profiles (speech therapists, phonopedists, phoniatrists, otolaryngologists). Higher school teachers have excessive voice and psychoemotional stress, recently complicated by distance learning. In the course of their work, they must meet the requirements for their voice quality in the process of performing teaching. The object of the research is the state of vocal abilities among teachers of higher education. Subject – generalization of methods of voice restoration among teachers of higher education, actualization of the importance of preventive and hygienic work to prevent professional voice disorders. The working hypothesis of the study consists of the assumption that timely diagnosis and systematic use of selected speech therapy and phonopedic measures will optimize the process of restoring laryngeal functions among university teachers. This paper describes an empirical study of the characteristics of the voice in high school teachers (Pacific State University), identifies the main factors affecting voice health and the causes of their occurrence. Based on the analysis of the survey data obtained from the survey and previously conducted theoretical and practical research, materials (brochures) and videos (master classes) on hygiene and prevention of voice disorders were prepared for university teachers. The scientific contribution of the research consists in obtaining empirical results in the designated problem field, combining speech therapy and phonopedic scientific and methodological materials for practical use by persons with voice-speech professions. The direction of future research will be to expand the group of respondents (teachers, educators, students) for diagnostic measurements and subsequent comparative analysis of the data obtained.

References

  1. 1. Василенко Ю.С. Голос. Фониатрические аспекты / Ю.С. Василенко. – М. Энергоиздат, 2002. – 408 с.
  2. 2. Орлова О.С. Нарушение голоса: учеб. пособие / О.С. Орлова. – М.: АСТ: Астрель; Владимир: ВКТ, 2008. – 220 с.
  3. 3. Фомина М.Ф. Профилактика и лечение нарушений голоса у лиц голосоречевых профессий: методические указания / М.Ф. Фомина. – Оренбург: ГОУ ОГУ, 2004. – 19 с.
  4. 4. Рудин Л.Б. Руководство по голососбережению (медико-профилактическая технология) / Л.Б. Рудин. – М.: Граница, 2020. – 496 с.
  5. 5. Лаврова Е.В. Значение постановки речевого голоса в профилактике возникновения голосовых расстройств / Е.В. Лаврова, И.А. Михалевская // Сборник научных трудов. II конгресс Российской общественной академии голоса. – М.: Граница, 2009. – С. 87–93.
  6. 6. Ларина Е.А. Фонопедическая терапия при органических заболеваниях голосового аппарата у лиц голосо-речевых профессий / Е.А. Ларина, М.Е. Ерёма, М.В. Погудина // Научные исследования и разработки. 69 международная научно-практическая конференция. Часть 7, №11(69). – М.: Евразийское научное объединение, 2020, – С. 512–516.
  7. 7. Проблемы профессионального отбора лиц голосо-речевых профессий [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://nikio.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/(дата обращения: 02.09.2021).
  8. 8. Aronson, Arnold E. Clinical voice disorders / Arnold E. Aronson, Diane M. Bless. – 4th ed. – Thieme Medical Pub- lishers, 2009. – 301 p.
  9. 9. Colton, R. H. Understanding voice problems: a physiolog- ical perspective for diagnosis and treatment / R. H. Colton, J. K. Casper, R. Leonard. – Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. – 498 p.
  10. 10. Савостьянов А.И. Техника речи в профессиональной подготовке учителя / А.И. Савостьянов. – М.: Гуманит. изд. центр Владос, 2001. – 144 с.
  11. 11. Jacobson, E. Progressive relaxation. – 2nd ed. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.
  12. 12. Analysis and evaluatien of voice-training program in future professional voice / B. Timmermans [et al.] // J. Voice. – 2005. – Vol. 19 (2). – P. 202–210.
  13. 13. Вайнер Э.Н. К вопросу об основополагающих признаках валеологии: Валеология / Э.Н. Вайнер. – 1997. – №4. – С. 5.
  14. 14. Andersson, K. Etiology and treatment of psychogenic voice disorder: results of a follow-up study of thirty patients/ K. Andersson, L. Schalen // J. Voice. – 1998. – Vol. 12.- No 1. – P. 96–106.
  15. 15. Chan, R. W. Does the voice improve with vocal hygiene ed- ucation? A study of some instrumental voice measures in group of kindergarten teachers/ R. W. Chan // J. Voice. – 1994. – Vol. 8 (3). – P. 279.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.