The Model pf Psychological and Pedagocic Support of Safe Activities of Adolescents with Intellectual Disability

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Author:
Nataliya A. Stepanova 1
Work direction:
Problems of psychological safety of the environment in the system of special and inclusive education
Pages:
361-363
Received: 28 October 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2265
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy

Abstract

The article examines the issue of ensuring the psychological safety of students with intellectual disability. The necessity of development of the model of safe activities support for adolescents with intellectual disability, the definition of its structural components, which should reflect both the list of involved specialists and their direct functionality, and the specifics of their interaction with each other and with the object of support are described in the present article.

References

  1. 1. Kazantseva E.V. Features of psychological and pedagogical support of children with moderate and severe mental retardation in the system of education and upbringing in a school of the VIII type // Special education. – 2010. – No. 1. – S. 12–21.
  2. 2. Kislyakov P.A., Feofanov V.N., Shmeleva E.A., Silaeva O.A. Socio-psychological safety of adolescents with intellectual disabilities in educational organizations of various types // Modern studies of social problems. – 2017. – Volume 8. – No. 8. – P. 85–98.
  3. 3. Stepanova N.A. Psychological safety of the personality of a teenager with intellectual disability // Social and humanitarian knowledge, No. 3, 2014. – P. 179–185.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.