The Phenomenon of Culture in the Philosophy of the French Enlightenment

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-75440
Open Access
Monograph «Culture. Science. Education: Current Issues»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Culture. Science. Education: Current Issues»
Author:
Svetlana G. Gutova 1
Work direction:
Глава 1. Культура
Pages:
9-22
Received: 24 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
5519
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE “Nizhnevartovsk State University”

Abstract

The most relevant features of the French Enlightenment are studied in the article. One of the features is ambivalence, that was expressed in most of the theoretical judgments by representatives of the era. The main ideas of the French Enlightenment are presented through the prism of the historical formation of the basic concepts: nature, human brain, culture. It is emphasized that the main achievement of the enlighteners in the cultural reformation of society was to combat religious and moral prejudices. It is noted that the value of enlighteners is in their innovative attempt to create a progressive model of cultural development based on a naturalistic and mechanical and deterministic picture of the world. The philosophical and cultural analysis revealed the internal dynamics of the enlighteners' ideas from civilizational optimism to criticism of civilizational progress. It is concluded that the philosophical and theoretical legacy of the Enlightenment, in the framework of the development of a single paradigm, is integral, logical and actually complete, that made the most use of its methodological and heuristic potential.

References

  1. 1. Богуславский В.М. Скептицизм в философии. – М.: Наука, 1990. – 272 с.
  2. 2. Вольтер. Избранные сочинения. – М.: Рипол Классик, 1997. – 846 с.
  3. 3. Вольтер. Философские повести. – М.: Правда, 1985. – 574 с.
  4. 4. Вольтер. Философские сочинения. – М.: Наука, 1989. – 752 с.
  5. 5. Дидро Д. Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 1. – М.: Мысль, 1986. – 592 с.
  6. 6. Ермаков В.С. Справочник по истории философии: хронологический, персонифицированный. – СПб.: Союз, 2003. – 447 с.
  7. 7. История философии: Запад – Россия – Восток. Кн 2: Философия XV-XIX вв. – М.: Греко-латинский кабинет Ю.А. Шичалина, 1996. – 557 с.
  8. 8. Ламетри Ж.О. Сочинения / пер. В. Левицкий, Э.А. Гроссман. – М.: Мысль, 1983. – 511 с.
  9. 9. Маркс К. Сочинения: в 30 т. Т. 2 / К. Маркс, Ф. Энгельс. – 2-е изд. – М.: Госполитиздат, 1955. – 652 с.
  10. 10. Монтень М. Опыты: в 3 кн. Кн. 1, 2. – СПб.: Кристалл; Респекс, 1998. – 960 с.
  11. 11. Руссо Ж.Ж. Об общественном договоре. Трактаты. – М.: Канон-пресс; Кучково поле, 1998. – 416 с.
  12. 12. Современный философский словарь / под общей ред. В.Е. Кемерова. – 3-е изд., испр. и доп. – М.: Академический проект, 2004. – 864 с.
  13. 13. Хоркхаймер М. Диалектика просвещения. Философские фрагменты / М. Хоркхаймер, Т.В. Адорно. – М.; СПб.: Медиум; Ювента, 1997. – 312 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.