“The song helps us to build and to live”: the role and functions of the ethnic song in Moscow Chuvash and Mari diasporic groups

Research Article
EDN: BFJRNE DOI: 10.31483/r-107989
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 5
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 5
Author:
Marina V. Kutsaeva 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
40-48
Received: 30 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 November 2023 / Published: 18 December 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1313
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
For citation:
Kutsaeva M. V. (2023). “The song helps us to build and to live”: the role and functions of the ethnic song in Moscow Chuvash and Mari diasporic groups. Ethnic Culture, 5(4), 40-48. EDN: BFJRNE. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-107989
UDC 316.74:[811.512.111:398.8+811.511.151:398.8]

Abstract

The paper studies the role and functions of songs in an ethnic language in the life of representatives of the internal diaspora. The article is based on the results of sociolinguistic surveys conducted in Chuvash and Mari diasporas of the Moscow region in 2014–2017 and 2019–2021, respectively. The researcher employed the following sociolinguistic methods: direct observation, participant observation, structured interviews of respondents, documentary recording of responses, statistical data analysis. One of the blocks in the sociolinguistic questionnaire included such aspects as the language – in – culture and ethnic culture maintenance in the context of the vitality of ethnic language. Ethnic culture, along with the ethnic language, is one of the key markers of ethnic identity in both samples. As the results of the survey demonstrate, songs in Mari or Chuvash occupy a significant place in the respondents’ life. Several functions of the ethnic song were identified: adaptation to new living conditions; co-optation of new members (i. e., through cultural ethnic events); creative self-realization; language learning (i. e., ethnic songs used for educational purposes in language courses); initiation into language and culture for new speakers of Chuvash and Mari. The role of ethnic song in the revitalization of the language has been equally determined.

References

  1. 1. Kalinina, O. A. (2011). Prazdniki v sovremennom bytu gorodskikh mariitsev. Razvitie gumanitarnykh issledovanii v Respublike Marii El, 158-163.
  2. 2. Kondrat'ev, M. G. (2018). Chuvashskaia muzyka v zerkale parallelei: k probleme Volgo-Ural'skoi muzykal'noi tsivilizatsii. 447 s. Cheboksary: Chuvashskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo. EDN: VXQEJG.
  3. 3. Kondrat'ev, M. G. (2012). Chuvashskaia muzyka: ot mifologicheskikh vremen do stanovleniia sovremennogo professionalizma. 288 s. Moskva: Per Se. EDN: RAYXPZ.
  4. 4. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2022). The Mari language in Moscow: the problem of ethnic language preservation in the conditions of internal diaspora. Finno-ugric studies , 63, 30-44. EDN: NJNNRW. https://doi.org/10.51254/2312-0312_2022_63_03
  5. 5. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2023). The village helps those who help themselves: on the question of language practices and ideologies in the Chuvash and Mari diasporas in the Moscow region. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 2, 65-78. EDN: LAYKSX. https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2023-2-65-78
  6. 6. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2021). New speakers of Mari as a factor in diaspora language vitality. Rodnoy Yazyk, 2, 5-34.
  7. 7. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2023). The problem of ethnocultural preservation in the internal diasporas (on the material of field research in the Moscow region Chuvash and Mari diasporas). Vestnik of moscow state linguistic university. Humanities , 2, 158-165. EDN: ONIGEY. https://doi.org/10.52070/2542-2197_2023_2_870_158
  8. 8. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2021). Early ethnic language acquisition in Moscow region mari diaspora. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, 3, 49-58. EDN: OOUEYF. https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2021-3-49-58
  9. 9. Kutsaeva, M. V. Funktsionirovanie etnicheskogo iazyka v chuvashskoi diaspore moskovskogo regiona, 312.
  10. 10. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2020). Ethnic musical culture of Moscow Mari (1). Ethnic Culture, 2, 24-30. EDN: GFVZGT. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75842
  11. 11. Kutsaeva, M. V. (2020). Ethnic musical culture of Moscow Mari (2). Ethnic Culture, 3, 11-18. EDN: LUUFBY. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75887
  12. 12. Mushkina, N. V. (2013). Muzykal'nyi fol'klor. Mariitsy : istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki, 341-354.
  13. 13. Iagafova, E. A. (2017). Sovremennaia prazdnichno-obriadovaia kul'tura. Chuvashi : sbornik, 470-487.
  14. 14. Baker, C. (1992). Attitudes and language.173 p. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  15. 15. Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. 198 p. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  16. 16. Edwards, J. (2009). Language and identity. 314 p. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
  17. 17. Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon.
  18. 18. Grant, C. (2018). A case for greater interdisciplinary collaboration in language and music revitalization. The Routledge Handbook of Language Revitalization, 236-244. York ;.
  19. 19. Grenoble, L. A. (2021). Why Revitalize? Introduction. Revitalizing Endangered Languages : A Practical Guide, 9-22.
  20. 20. Ortiz, G. (2021). Llanes Art, music and cultural activities. Revitalizing Endangered Languages : A Practical Guide, 273-283.
  21. 21. Moriarty, M. (2021). New roles for endangered languages. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, 446-458.
  22. 22. Sallabank, J., & King, J. (2021). &, What do we Revitalize? Introduction. Revitalizing Endangered Languages : A Practical Guide, 33-45.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.