Linguistic representation of the concept “market” in attributive structures (based on the British publicistic text)

Review Article
EDN: LEEGIP DOI: 10.31483/r-105824
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 5
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 5
Authors:
Vera V. Koroleva 1 , Marina S. Rumyantseva 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
43-47
Received: 22 March 2023 / Accepted: 2 May 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1350
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Vladimir State University
For citation:
Koroleva V. V., & Rumyantseva M. S. (2023). Linguistic representation of the concept “market” in attributive structures (based on the British publicistic text). Ethnic Culture, 5(2), 43-47. EDN: LEEGIP. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-105824
UDC 811.111’367 + 811.111’37

Abstract

The article reveals the notion of “attribute” and provides the characteristic features of the attributive syntactic structures of the analyzed concept “market”. The purpose of the study is to describe the structure and semantics of the following syntactic models: N + N, P + N, DJ + N, PT + N, NU + N, with the nuclear lexeme “market” in publicistic texts. The relevance of the work is due to the insufficiency of study of the concept we are examining at the syntactic level. The main focus is on the analysis of prepositional one- and two-component attributive structures, as well as the characteristics of the semantic relationships of the elements of the phrase. The material for the study was the articles from the magazine “The Economist” (2023). In the course of the work, the methods of conceptual, contextual, semantic and logical analysis were used. The results of the research showed that the syntactic structures of the substantive and adjective group are the most frequent in the studied texts. The connection of the lexemes within the selected contexts is conditioned on semantic relationships of performance, belonging or purpose. Consideration of attributive phrases makes it possible to expand the following slots of the concept under study: market mechanism, market structure and state of market by including lexemes defining the core lexical unit.

References

  1. 1. Boldyrev N. N. (2011). Interpretiruyushchaya funkciya yazyka. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 33, 11–16. EDN OZMWHT
  2. 2. Boldyrev N. N. (2019). Language and the system of knowledge. A cognitive theory of language. Izdatel'skij dom YASK. EDN OXLIYG
  3. 3. Zavarzina G. A. (2011). Peculiarities of functioning of concept “market” in the field of Russian public administration in the beginning of the XXI century. Political Linguistics, 4, 197–201. EDN ORIJZL
  4. 4. Murashova L. P. (2015). The means of expression of the conceptual-cognitive frame “woman”. Language and Culture, 2, 76–83. DOI 10.17223/19996195/30/8. EDN UCBQHD
  5. 5. Naumenko L. P. (2014). Subordinacіjnij koncept “market” u suchasnomu anglomovnomu bіznes-diskursі. Naukovі studії-HKHІ. Fіlosofіya. Fіlologіya. Pedagogіka. Ekonomіka, 4(6), 95–108.
  6. 6. Stolyarova A. O. (2020). Key concepts of business discourse. Cognitive studies of language, 2, 473–477. EDN PYDTDX
  7. 7. Tkachenko A. V. (2020). Attributive word combinations from the viewpoints of traditional and cognitive approaches (be the material of the English language). Philology. Theory & Practice., 13(4), 80–86. DOI 10.30853/filnauki.2020.4.17. EDN AMBTMV
  8. 8. Chernyak V. D., & Parysheva E. V. (2020). Definitions of rynok (market) and bazar (bazaar) in anthropocentric dictionaries. Izvestia: Herzen university journal of humanities & sciences, 198, 161–170. DOI 10.33910/1992-6464-2020-198-161-170. EDN QNYJDY
  9. 9. Dirven R., Polzenhagen F., & Wolf H. G. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 1222–1240.
  10. 10. Croft W., & Cruse. D. A. (2005). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.