Development of education Развитие образования Development of education Вĕренӳ аталанăвĕ 2619-1466 2618-8910 ИД «Среда» 10.31483/r-105300 TJUZYN 105300 Научная статья Research Article Ăслăлăх статйи Педагогика и современное образование Pedagogy and Modern Education Педагогика тата хальхи вĕренӳ The Relation between Reading Strategy Use and Reading Performance among Students Взаимосвязь между использованием стратегии чтения и продуктивностью чтения у студентов Студентсем суйласа илнĕ вулав стратегийӗпе вулав продуктивлӑхӗн çыхăнăвĕ https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3529-3256 Мусема Аман Musema Aman Мусема Аман

магистр , аспирант

master , PHD student

магистр

musemaaman@gmail.com https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-6067 Джеремью Лему Geremew Lemu Джеремью Лему

д-р пед. наук, инструктор

doctor of pedagogic sciences, instructor

д-р пед. наук

 geremew90lemu@gmail.com 038b8e254 Аддис-Абебский университет Эфиопия 038b8e254 Addis Ababa University Ethiopia 038b8e254 Аддис-Абеба университечӗ 29 05 2023 2023 6 2 50 56 29 01 2023 15 05 2023 © 2023 Musema Aman, Geremew Lemu © 2023 Мусема Аман, Джеремью Лему © 2023 Мусема Аман, Джеремью Лему 2023 Мусема Аман, Джеремью Лему Musema Aman, Geremew Lemu Мусема Аман, Джеремью Лему This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Ку статья Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) лицензипе пӑхӑнать

the purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between the use of reading strategies and reading achievement between high and low EFL university students in Ethiopia. To this effect, sixty students were selected (30 top high achievers and 30 least low achievers) using stratified sampling technique. The Survey of Reading Strategies and Reading Comprehension Test were employed to discover students’ reading strategy use, and to measure their reading ability respectively. Thus, thirty reading strategies of the survey and fifty reading comprehension questions were administered to students. The data gathered was statistically analyzed through descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test and Pearson correlation. The findings of the study revealed that High achievers adopted a diverse and more reading strategies in higher frequency compared to low achievers. This difference between the groups was significant. The result also showed that there was a relationship between students’ three main strategies use (i.e., global, problem-solving and support reading strategies and their reading achievement). Based on the findings, it was recommended to raise awareness to enhance students' use of various strategies at higher frequency and the low achievers must be encouraged to use the reading strategies more frequently in general and global reading strategies in particular.

Цель исследования состояла в изучении взаимосвязи между использованием стратегий чтения и продуктивностью чтения между студентами с высоким и низким уровнем владения иностранным языком в университетах Эфиопии. С этой целью было отобрано шестьдесят учащихся (30 наиболее успевающих и 30 наименее успевающих) с использованием метода стратифицированной выборки. Было выявлено, что студенты использовали глобальные, проблемные и поддерживающие стратегии чтения. Глобальная стратегия характеризуется, например, действием: «Я просматриваю текст в целом, чтобы понять, о чем он, прежде чем читать его». Проблемная стратегия – «Я пытаюсь представить информацию, чтобы лучше запомнить прочитанное». Поддерживающая стратегия подразумевает использование вспомогательных средств при чтении, например, словарей. Вместе с этим был проведен тест на понимание прочитанного. Собранные данные были подвергнуты статистическому анализу с помощью описательной статистики, t-критерия независимых выборок и корреляции Пирсона. Результаты исследования показали, что существует взаимосвязь между использованием учащимися всех трех основных стратегий (т. е. глобальной, проблемной и поддерживающей) и продуктивностью их чтения. Чем больше студент использует разнообразных стратегий чтения, тем выше уровень понимания прочитанного. Основываясь на полученных данных, рекомендуется повысить осведомленность учащихся о существовании различных стратегий чтения, чтобы они чаще их использовали. Слабоуспевающим студентам рекомендуется чаще использовать стратегии чтения в целом и глобальную стратегию в частности.

тӗпчев тӗллевӗ – Эфиопи университечӗсенче тăван мар чĕлхене лайăх пĕлекен тата япăх пĕлекен студентсен ют чӗлхепе çырнă ĕçсене вуланă чухнехи вулав стратегийĕпе вулав продуктивлӑхĕ хушшинчи çыхăнăвне тĕпчесе пĕлесси. Ҫак тӗллевпе стратификациленӗ суйлав мелĕпе усӑ курса утмӑл студента (30 чи лайăх вĕренекен тата 30 кая юлса пыракан) суйласа илнӗ. Студентсем пĕтĕмĕшле, проблемăллă тата пулăшуллă вулав стратегийӗсемпе усӑ курни палӑрнӑ. Пĕтĕмĕшле стратеги, сӑмахран, çакăн пек йĕркеленет: «Эпӗ текста пӗтӗмӗшле пӑхса тухатӑп, вӑл мӗн ҫинчен пулнине вуличчен малтан ӑнланас тетӗп». Проблемӑллӑ стратеги: «Эпӗ вуласа тухнине лайӑхрах астуса юлас тесе информацие ăсра ӳкеретĕп». Пулӑшуллă стратеги вуланӑ чухне пулӑшу хатӗрӗпе, сӑмахран, словарьпе, усӑ курнине пӗлтерет. Ҫакӑнпа пӗрлех вуланине мĕнле ӑнланнине уçăмлатакан тест ирттернĕ. Пухнӑ даннӑйсене сăнласа кӑтартакан статистика пулӑшнипе, t-критерипе ирĕклĕ суйласа илсе тата Пирсон корреляцийӗ пулӑшнипе статистика анализĕ тунă. Тӗпчев результачӗсем виҫӗ тӗп стратегипе (пĕтĕмĕшле, проблемăллă тата пулăшуллă вулав) усă курни тата студентсен вулавӗн тухӑҫлӑхӗ пӗр-пӗринпе ҫыхӑннине кӑтартса панă. Студент вулавӑн тӗрлӗ стратегийӗсемпе мӗн чухлӗ ытларах усӑ курать, вуланине çавӑн чухлӗ лайăхрах ăнланать. Пухнă даннӑйсене тӗпе хурса вуламалли тӗрлӗ стратеги пурри ҫинчен вӗренекенсен тĕплĕнрех каласа памалла, вӗсемпе час-часах усӑ курма сĕнмелле. Начар вӗренекен студентсене нумайрах вуламалли стратегипе, уйрӑмах, пĕтĕмĕшле стратегипе усӑ курма сӗнеҫҫӗ.

 стратегии чтения глобальная стратегия чтения проблемная стратегия чтения поддерживающая стратегия чтения продуктивность чтения global problem-solving and support reading strategies correlational study and reading achievement вулав стратегийĕ пĕтĕмĕшле вулав стратегийĕ проблемӑллӑ вулав стратегийĕ пулăшуллă вулав стратегийĕ вулав продуктивлӑхĕ author-orcid 0000-0003-3529-3256 (Musema Aman) author-orcid 0000-0001-6651-6067 (Geremew Lemu) References Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. Learning from text: A multidimensional developmental perspective. In Kamil, M. L., & Mosenthal, P. B., & Pearson, P. D., & Barr R. (Eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 2000. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional developmental perspective. In Kamil, M. L., & Mosenthal, P. B., & Pearson, P. D., & Barr R. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, 285–310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Barr R. Alexander P. A. Jetton T. L. Kamil M. L. Mosenthal P. B. Pearson P. D. & Learning from text: A multidimensional developmental perspective. In, &, &, & (Eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 2000 Belilew, M. The relationship between reading strategy use and reading comprehension among Ethiopian EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL). 2015. №3(9). P 34–41. Belilew, M. (2015). The relationship between reading strategy use and reading comprehension among Ethiopian EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 3(9), 34–41. Belilew M. The relationship between reading strategy use and reading comprehension among Ethiopian EFL learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL). 2015. №3(9). P 34–41 Bernhardt, E. B. Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading. Routledge. 2011. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852408 Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading. New York: Routledge. 215 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852408 Bernhardt E. B. Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading. Routledge. 2011 10.4324/9780203852408 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852408 Evans, J. D. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. 1996. Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Company. Evans J. D. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (Eds.). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. 2012. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (Eds.). (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. Fraenkel J. R. Wallen N. E. Hyun H. H. Companies I. &, & (Eds.). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill2012 Grabe, W. Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press. 2009. Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grabe W. Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press. 2009 Huang, J., & Nisbet, D. The relationship between reading proficiency and reading strategy use: A study of adult ESL learners. Journal of Adult Education. 2014. №43(2). P 1–11. Huang, J., & Nisbet, D. (2014). The relationship between reading proficiency and reading strategy use: A study of adult ESL learners. Journal of Adult Education, 43(2), 1–11. Huang J. Nisbet D. &The relationship between reading proficiency and reading strategy use: A study of adult ESL learners. Journal of Adult Education. 2014. №43(2). P 1–11 Kim, H. The relationships between Korean university students’ reading attitude, reading strategy use, and reading proficiency. Reading Psychology. 2016. №37(8). P 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1193581. Kim, H. (2016). The relationships between Korean university students’ reading attitude, reading strategy use, and reading proficiency. Reading Psychology, 37(8), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1193581. Kim H. The relationships between Korean university students’ reading attitude, reading strategy use, and reading proficiency. Reading Psychology. 2016. №37(8). P 1–34 10.1080/02702711.2016.1193581 https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1193581 Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. Awareness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching. 2012. №5(12). P 131–140. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p131 Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Awareness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p131 Madhumathi P. Ghosh A. &Awareness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching. 2012. №5(12). P 131–140 10.5539/elt.v5n12p131 https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p131 Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002. № 94(2). P 249–259. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. Mokhtari K. Reichard C. &Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2002. № 94(2). P 249–259 Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. Measuring ESL Students’ Aware-ness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education. 2002. №25(3). P 2–10. Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10. Mokhtari K. Sheorey R. &Measuring ESL Students’ Aware-ness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education. 2002. №25(3). P 2–10 Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (Eds.) Reading Strategies of First and Second-Language Learners: See how they read. Christopher-Gordon Pub-lishers, Inc. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.009 Reading Strategies of First and Second-Language Learners: See how they read, Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (Eds.), Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc., Norwood, Mass (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.009 Mokhtari K. Sheorey R. &(Eds.) Reading Strategies of First and Second-Language Learners: See how they read. Christopher-Gordon Pub-lishers, Inc. 2008 10.1016/j.system.2009.02.009 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.009 Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2017. №21(3). P 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763. Muijselaar, M. M. L., Swart, N. M., Steenbeek-Planting, E. G., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. F. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763. Muijselaar M. M. Swart N. M. Steenbeek-Planting E. G. Droop M. Verhoeven L. Jong P. F. L.,,,,, & de Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading. 2017. №21(3). P 194–209 10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763 https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763 Par, L. The Relationship between Reading Strategies and Read-ing Achievement of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction. 2020. №13(2). P 223–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a Par, L. (2020). The Relationship between Reading Strategies and Reading Achievement of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a Par L. The Relationship between Reading Strategies and Read-ing Achievement of the EFL Students. International Journal of Instruction. 2020. №13(2). P 223–238 10.29333/iji.2020.13216a https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13216a Phakiti, A. A closer look at the relationship of problem-solving and global strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing. 2003. №20(1). P 26–56. Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of problem-solving and global strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. Phakiti A. A closer look at the relationship of problem-solving and global strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing. 2003. №20(1). P 26–56 Shang, H. EFL medical students’ metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2018. №30(2). P 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528–017–9156-y. Shang, H. (2018). EFL medical students’ metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528–017–9156-y. Shang H. EFL medical students’ metacognitive strategy use for hypertext reading comprehension. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2018. №30(2). P 259–278 10.1007/s12528–017–9156-y https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528–017–9156-y Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System. 2001. №29(4). P 431–449. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. Sheorey R. Mokhtari K. &Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System. 2001. №29(4). P 431–449 Trudell, B. Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of «reading culture» in African contexts. International Review of Education. 2019. №65. P 427–442. Trudell, B. (2019). Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of «reading culture» in African contexts. International Review of Education, 65, 427–442. Trudell B. Reading in the classroom and society: An examination of «reading culture» in African contexts. International Review of Education. 2019. №65. P 427–442 Zhang, L. J. Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness. 2001. №10(4). P 268–288. Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268–288. Zhang L. J. Awareness in reading: EFL students' metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness. 2001. №10(4). P 268–288 Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 2013. №10(1). P 54–69. Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69. Zhang L. Seepho S. &Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 2013. №10(1). P 54–69