En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Pedagogy, Psychology, Society
  4. Reflection of the problems of the digital age in c...

Reflection of the problems of the digital age in cinematic reflection: the image of the Double

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-103337
Open Access
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society»
Author:
Anastasia S. Bolshakova 1
Work direction:
Социальная философия
Pages:
26-28
Received: 14 September 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
1072
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Bolshakova A. S. (2022). Reflection of the problems of the digital age in cinematic reflection: the image of the Double. Pedagogy, Psychology, Society, 26-28. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-103337

Abstract

The article attempts to consider the relationship between the Self and the Double through the prism of modern cinema, which, being an integral part of the culture of the digital age, esthetically reveals the problem of the duality of the human Self. On the example of the film "The Enemy" by D. Villeneuve, we observe the process of splitting the subject, the meeting of a person with his double. It is assumed that digitalization makes it possible to consider the Cartesian conclusion about doubt in a new way. Doubt is an indicator of a failure in the measured existence of a person, causing a double to come to life, while the double, in turn, doubts you, emphasizing the presence of yourself and you, who gave birth to him. “I think, therefore, my twins exist” is a thesis that characterizes the modern digital reality in which a person resides due to the constant alienation of a part of his Self, his self-consciousness into virtuality.

References

  1. 1. Акчурин Б.Г. Человеческая телесность и социальные аспекты ее идентификации: дис. … д-ра филос. наук / Б.Г. Акчурин. – Уфа, 2004. – 315 с.
  2. 2. Абрахам К. Паук как символ в сновидениях / пер. с англ. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.psychol-ok.ru/lib/abraham/pauk_kak_v_snov/ (дата обращения: 30.08.2022).
  3. 3. Большакова А.С. Осмысление концепта Я-другой в контексте построения новой длительности // Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке. – 2022. – Т. 11. №1А. – С. 209–221.
  4. 4. Борхес Х.-Л. Интервью с Марией Эстер Васкес // Borges igual a si mismo. – 1994. – 2 с.
  5. 5. Достоевский Ф.М. Полное собрание сочинений в 30 томах. Т. 3. Двойник. – Л.: Наука, 1972–1990. – С. 436.
  6. 6. Исупов К.Г. Двойник (из авторского словаря «Космос русского самосознания») // Общество. Среда. Развитие (Terra Humana). – 2007. – №2 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dvoynik-iz-avtorskogo-slovarya-kosmos-russkogo-samosoznaniya (дата обращения: 28.08.2022).
  7. 7. Хайдеггер М. Время и бытие: Статьи и выступления / М. Хайдеггер. – М.: Республика, 1993. – C. 331.
  8. 8. Хайдеггер М. Декартово cogito sum // Хайдеггер М. Европейский нигилизм. – М.: Республика, 1993. – С. 542.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.