The Scope and Content of the Notion of Phraseomatic Unit (Based on the English Language Material)

Research Article
EDN: ZWXGQQ DOI: 10.31483/r-102914
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Authors:
Vladimir M. Savitskij 1 , Denis V. Gadalin 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
37-40
Received: 27 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
1717
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
For citation:
Savitskij V. M., & Gadalin D. V. (2022). The Scope and Content of the Notion of Phraseomatic Unit (Based on the English Language Material). Ethnic Culture, 4(3), 37-40. EDN: ZWXGQQ. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-102914
UDC 81ʹ37

Abstract

The purpose of the research described in the article is to further develop the definition of phraseomatic units and find their position in the system of idiomatics. The research methods applied in the work include dictionary definitions analysis, semantic analysis, comparative analysis. The results of the research are as follows: in the course of analysis the authors showed the characteristic features of phraseomatic units against the background of other kinds of idiomatic units of language; characterized the types of meaning reinterpretation in the process of phrases’ semantic transposition in general and in the process of phraseomatic units generation in particular; revealed the predominant sphere of their speech usage (the discourse of professional communication). The prospects of further research are: studying phraseomatisms in connection with their terminological function, their ability to determine the most important quality of the object of nomination, are bound to deepen our understanding of their place in the system of idiomatics, and therefore they are sure to bring us closer to solving the riddle of idiomaticity. Phraseomatic units and other idiomatic units of language must be studied within the framework of a unified theory of idiomatics. All kinds of idiomatic units have not only specific but also common features, which makes it possible to unify them into one structural and semantic class.

References

  1. 1. Balli, Sh. (2009). Frantsuzskaia stilistika, 384. Moskva : Izdatel'skaia gruppa URSS.
  2. 2. Erokhina, N. V. (1999). Struktura i funktsii idiom (na materiale substantivnykh ustoichivykh slovosochetanii i slozhnykh sushchestvitel'nykh angliiskogo iazyka) : dissertatsiia na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata filologicheskikh nauk : 10.02.04, 198. Samara.
  3. 3. Kunin, A. V. (2005). Kurs frazeologii sovremennogo angliiskogo iazyka, 488. Dubna : Feniks+,.
  4. 4. Kunin, A. V. (1984). Predislovie. Anglo-russkii frazeologicheskii slovar' (pp. 7-14). Moskva: Russkii iazyk.
  5. 5. Mokienko, V. M. (1989). Slavianskaia frazeologiia, 287. Moskva : Vysshaia shkola.
  6. 6. Molchkova, L. V. (2014). Phraseomatic units as the product of the phraseomatic code work. Modern problems of science and education (4). Retrieved from https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=14239
  7. 7. Mochalina, K. N. (2011). Towards Defining Phrase and Lexical Idioms. Izvestia of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 13(2), 970-974.
  8. 8. Porzhezinskii, V. K. (2019). Vvedenie v iazykovedenie, 250. Moskva : Izdatel'skaia gruppa URSS.
  9. 9. Savitskii, V. M. (2006). Osnovy obshchei teorii idiomatiki, 208. Moskva : Gnozis.
  10. 10. Savitskii, V. M., & Nurtdinova, L. R. (2020). Structural-semantic specificity of phraseomatisms in comparison with phraseologisms. Foreign languages in tertiary education, (4), 5-12.
  11. 11. Feierbakh, L. (1974). Izlozhenie, analiz i kritika filosofii Leibnitsa. Feierbakh L. Istoriia filosofii (vol. 2, pp. 101-403). Moskva: Mysl'.
  12. 12. Shakhmatov, A. A. (2019). Ocherk sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo iazyka, 235. Moskva : Iurait.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.